My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9,1998 <br />cm' ADMINISTRATOR ’S REPORT <br />(#13) OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD BIKE 'TRAIL AGREEMENT <br />Moorse reported that the agreement involves the construction of the remainder of the <br />trail to Baker Park and on-going maintenance by Hennepin Parks. The trail will become <br />part of the Hennepin Parks Regional Park System. <br />Flint expressed concern with paragraph 11 regarding hazardous materials calling for the <br />City to indemnify Hennepin Parks. Barrett said the County views the trail as the City s <br />property and wants to be held harmless. Flint noted that the City does not own the <br />property but has an easement. Barrett said technically the person responsible for any <br />hazardous material would be the person who deposited the material on the property. <br />Barrett did not believe the indemnification created any new liability. Barrett felt it was a <br />problem of practicality noting the expense is in proving who did what. Flint agreed with <br />Barrett. <br />Barrett suggested paragraph 5 include the additional statement, "unless mutually <br />agreeable substitute is developed". <br />Jabbour was informed by Barrett that the City would have to be reimbursed if the <br />Highway Department takes the property. <br />Kelley asked what happens if Hennepin Parks' standards change. Flint referenced 6a <br />regarding the scope of the license He feels this would override any change in standards. <br />Flint said 6b indicates the City will have to be notified. <br />Kelley asked what happens if the policy of no plowing changes. Jabbour said Hennepin <br />Parks does not want to change what is occurring in a City. Jabbour said the intent is for <br />the City to learn how to improve trails and encouraged continued dialogue. Barrett felt <br />the County has the discretion to remove snow if they deemed it necessary. Moorse noted <br />the trail connects to the Luce Line which is not plowed <br />Jabbour said the Council has to make a decision and identify goals and objectives. He <br />said he is an advocate for partnerships and all scenarios cannot be projected. Jabbour <br />noted that the Council asked for a minimum document. <br />Kelley said the Council needs to be aware that the City is giving up its rights and giving <br />the County the power. Jabbour indicated that the County has listened to issues of <br />concern Goetten noted that these same issues were discussed in the beginning of the <br />process Jabbour said the issue boils down to whether the Council wants to move <br />forward with the agreement. He noted that Hennepin Parks has made major <br />contributions to the City. Flint commented that major concessions have also been made <br />by the County from the first document, and he favored adopting the agreement.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.