My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9,1998 <br />(#11- #2341 Daniel J Anderson - Continued) <br />The question of using Countv land was discussed. Jabbour noted that the County land <br />had restrictions placed on it. The specific restrictions were unknown. <br />Kelley suggested the trail crossing occur at Fox Street. There would then only be four <br />properties that are of concern past that point, all of which have homes that are located <br />back on the lots from the road. On the east side of Old Crystal Bay Road, Kelley <br />indicated there were alot of homes close to the road that would have to be dealt with. He <br />felt a four way stop would happen in the near future at Fox Street. Kelley indicated that <br />with the school bus traffic and the southern portion of Orono traveling to the schools and <br />accelerating speeds, the stop sign is inevitable. <br />McD«,rmott suggested the road not be crossed. Kelley said it must be crossed at some <br />point Flint agreed with the location for crossing as noted by Kelley. McDermott <br />indicated that the costs associated with the retaining walls and vegetation would be high. <br />Jabbour said consideration also has to be given to the difficulty in having an off-trail <br />shoulder with the wetlands in the area <br />Bridget Hust of Minneapolis, whose parents live at 820 Old Crystal Bay Road, noted <br />there are restrictions on the County land in Noerenberg Park. She said her parents <br />property is a problem with its close proximity to the road. She felt there would be a <br />problem with acquiring an easement from the property with the pond. She questioned <br />why the trail should be located on the east side if the developer was willing to grant an <br />easement on their property and the neighbors desired the trail to be on the west side as <br />well. She felt her parents property has historic value and the trail would destroy it and <br />affect the qualify of life w ith the additional noise. Hust asked that the Council not force <br />her parents to have to move. <br />Jabbour clarified for Hust that the Council has not made the decision on the trail location <br />and it would be irresponsible for the City not to keep their options open. Goetten noted <br />that open discussion is part of the process and needs to be allowed to happen. <br />Yves Roux, who lives on the southeast comer of Fox Street and Old Crystal Bay Road, <br />said he has lived in the home for 10 years. He said representatives of Flennepin Parks <br />have said that the extension of the bike path south of the Luce Line is a secondary <br />consideration He does not believe there is a need for a scenic bike route and considers <br />the current bike path to be an aberration. He believes the trails are not in keeping with <br />the mral character of the City. Roux felt the City was becoming a roadway of fences and <br />had no concern for the watershed. Roux said trees would also be affected by the trail. <br />He would like to see detailed plans of the trail before it is built. Rue said he would not <br />allow' any trees to be cut on his property or allow any easement to be granted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.