Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: March 18, 1998 <br />Item No, <br />Department Approval: . Administrator Approval; <br />Name: Michael P. GaffronJ/* <br />Title: Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />\ <br />L <br />Item Description: Park Dedication Ordinance Amendment - Section 11.62 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Ordinance for Consideiation and Adoption <br />B - Ron Moorse Memo 2-9-98 <br />1 c4' <br />Please review Ron's memo dated February 9. <br />The proposed ordinance revisions address the rough proportionality issue, providing a basis for * T ' <br />determining the amount of park fees in relation to the impact of both residential and commercial <br />subdivisions on the City's park system. The ordinance also establishes that there will be ma.\imum <br />and minimum 'per dwelling unit' ('per employee' in the case of commercial) park fees established <br />by resolution each year, (see Subd. 3A and 3B) <br />Additionally, the ordinance provides for a park dedication exceeding the 'maximum amount per <br />dwelling unit' up to the 8% standard where a subdivision to be served by a neighborhood park <br />derives greater benefit from such park than the general population, (sec Subd. 3C) <br />The ordinance adds language regarding how park funds may be used, (see Subd. 4) <br />Tlie ordinanace eliminates the prior language which established a minimum contribution per lot of <br />$500 or per dwelling unit of $300. (see Subd. 5D) <br />The ordinance does not establish park dedication requirements for the development of properties <br />absent a subdivision/PRD/PUD process. It is not yet clear whether it is legal to do so, hence this is <br />left for future discussion. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />A public hearing w'as held by the Planning Commission on March 16. No members of the public <br />commented. Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment on a vote of 4-0.