Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9, 1998 <br />(#10 - #2339 James Render - Conlinued) <br />Gaffron indicated that Staff is today in receipt of a stormwater plan, but it has not yet <br />been reviewed by Staff Gaffron said he would recommend that the application be tabled <br />affer discussion of the proposal. Staff recommended a private road be platted with an <br />underlying easement to the City. Gafifron asked Council to consider whether the 42' in <br />width for the outlot added to the 8' of adjacent easement will satisfy the 50 ’ corridor. It <br />will have to be confirmed by the City Attorney that the city has roadway rights over the <br />8'. The Council is asked to determine whether the corridor should serve as a link to <br />connect Birch Lane to Tonkawa. <br />Gaffron indicated that the applicant has asked for a 17' credit towards hardcover if he <br />gives more than 25' for the road as he would lose area that could be considered in the <br />hardcover calculations Gaffron said Staff reluctantly supports that request. He noted <br />that larger homes could be built if there were only two lots instead of three. One lot <br />includes the existing house but the garage is located over the proposed lot line requiring <br />further review. <br />Gaffron reviewed the issues for discussion #1 through #5 as noted on page 4 of the <br />memo. <br />Mr. Render said he would like to create three lots with similar size homes to the <br />neighborhood with about 4000 s.f of hardcover. Render said he is not in favor of the <br />cul-de-sac option due to the public landing nearby. He agreed with the need for good <br />planning indicating a possible need to connect Birch Lane to Tonkawa in the future. He <br />reiterated his request for a hardcover variance to offset the property given for a road <br />easement <br />Render said the only other issue of concern is the requirement for a NURP pond. He said <br />the proposed pond has been pulled back on the property to protect two large oak trees. <br />He feels the rate of flow can be handled without requiring a NURP pond. He suggested <br />the possibility of making a cash contribution to the Watershed for mitigation <br />Jabbour informed the applicant that the City of Orono requires that all mitigation be on <br />site. He would not support any cash contributions in lieu of ponding on site. <br />Jabbour said, while he is not an advocate of the cul-de-sac requirement in the code, a cul- <br />de-sac cannot be selectively chosen. Jabbour felt it is best to look at the issue <br />comprehensively He felt it would be better not to have a cul-de-sac if the concerns of <br />the fire department could be addressed He felt the road should be 28' wide. Gaftron <br />said he is obligated to defend the code. He suggested the code be amended if the Council <br />is not comfortable with it as written. Jabbour said he is also concerned with violating the <br />Comprehensive Plan by having a private road in an urban area