My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. James Touve <br />March 22, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />-0066 <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />9. <br />Further, the fact that Lots 58 through 61 yield a parcel with less than 1/2 acre <br />dry biiildable contiguous area which can ’t be readily accessed without encroaching <br />on the wetland, suggests that Lots 58 through 61 are not buildable. It can, <br />however, be argued that while adding Lot 57 makes 58 through 61 potentially <br />buildable, that reduces the Olsen property to a less conforming or nonconforming <br />status. <br />Under the Wetland Conservation Act, any filling or draining of wetland requires <br />approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and perhaps the U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers. It is likely that in order to confirm your dry buildable <br />area you will have to hire a consultant to perform a wetland boundary delineation <br />under the State mandated methods. Note that the City code allows no filling, <br />grading, etc. within this wetland or within 26’ of its boundary. Even with Lot <br />57, it may be impossible to create a driveway to the rear of the property without <br />encroaching into the wetland setback. <br />You must gain approval from Hennepin County Department of Transportation for <br />a new driveway location entering on the county road. The Orono I^blic Works <br />Department would have jurisdiction over use of the alley for access. <br />The 30’ setback from the rear lot line and 26’ wetland setback yield a building <br />envelope barely wide enough for constmction of a house. A rear setback <br />variance for new construction may .. ; difficult for the Planning Commission and <br />Council to justify, given all the other factors involved with this property, as well <br />as the fact that a City natural park area exists directly north of the property. <br />Filling of the w land to create a better driveway or building envelope simation, <br />even with 2 to mitigation of wetlands, might be viable only if the wetland is <br />determined to have merely storm water quantity/quality values which might be <br />enhanced by such work without destroying other vi lues. <br />As of this writing, the City has not determined whether a downstream storm <br />water pond (east of 4064 North Shore Drive) is viable, necessary or appropriate <br />as a tradeoff to your contemplated filling of the wetland. <br />Lots 58 through 61 have been valued and taxed as nonbuildable since at least <br />1974 according to City tax records. For example, in 1977, Lots 55-56-57 were <br />assessed at a total valuation of $3,388.00 for 0.81 acre or $4,180.00 per acre; <br />Lots 58 through 61 had a total combined value of $880.00 for 0.92 acre or <br />$960.00 per acre, i.e. less than 1/4 of the value of the homestead lots. In 1993, <br />Lots 55-56-57 were valued at $31,600.00 or $39,000.00 per acre, while Lots 58- <br />59-60-61 were taxed ac a valuation of $100.00 each or $435.00 per acre, i.e.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.