My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2350 - 4196 North Shore Drive <br />March 12, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />tots 55-55 contain a house, and their bui.dabi.ity is no, ^ regardless whether <br />57 is included, to the extent no changes are made to that house. <br />Lots 58 thru 60 have not been considered as buildable by the assessor (see Exhibit <br />J-5), and the taxes paid on them have been minimal. <br />. NoneofLo,s55-51w^asassessedorprov« <br />allowed to connect to the nearby sew . .. possible from either the 1970 <br />Sewer eonnection lor the vacant ®Highwood project ($12,875 <br />Saga Hill project ($8,700 connection charge) or the fc <br />connection charge). <br />. tots 58.59.50.51 are not -ssi^^ <br />portion of the wetland. Applicant Touve s“88es‘® . house at 4140 <br />existing, but results from damming o i s ' addresses this topic, noting <br />was built many years ago. 1 he , 950 and then became a Type <br />that this was a Type 3 wetland prior to le . ,y j^pad 51 reconstruction <br />5. The basin was also partially filled as a « always there, but <br />in the 1960s. Staff interprets all this^ Ending that it isn’t <br />Staff Recommendation <br />StalTreeommends denial of the proposed <br />of the existing substandard homestead • P ^ ^1 subdivision because it did not <br />part of the legal property was sold in 198^ .» lot lines when <br />have Citv approval. This is not a problem t contrary to the code because it <br />such a move would be contrary to substandard lot. while potentially creating <br />-S'ilVn" : rS :f ;ue‘stionable buildability to star, with. <br />Denial of the subdivision will have to make <br />to some agreement for transferri ^ ____ rmnlication.to some <br />a case for the <br />Sbmw of 58:59-50.61 as a separate variance application. <br />Options for Action <br />Recommend approval. <br />Recommend denial. <br />Table for further information (specify)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.