My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MMICH 16, 1998 <br />I <br />s <br />(#5) #2350 Kevin and Lisa Olsen/Jim and June Touve - Continued) <br />Stoddard said it was his opinion that it would be best if lot 57 was combined with lots 55 <br />and 56 with a driveway easement granted to the other lots. Mabusth asked whether he <br />was requesting this of the applicant of if the buildability of the other lots were a <br />consideration. <br />Olsen informed the Commission that they are a large family, and it is not an option for her <br />to purchase the additional lot. She asked that the lots be addressed by those that she <br />owns. Lots 55 and 56. She would like to move forward. She asked if any other <br />information is necessary or questions regarding legal ow nership. She asked if the issue <br />was due to the substandard size of the property. Mabusth clarified that Olsen w ould like <br />the Commission to act on lots 55 and 56 only. <br />Smith agreed that the substandard size was an issue. Olsen said she did address this with <br />Gaffron, and had told her he w ould not give his opinion on this, and Olsen thought the lot <br />size was satisfactory. Gaffron was asked if additional information was needed to assist in <br />changing his opinion. Gaffron said he has read through the historic file and reviewed the <br />1987 file, and Staff will not support the subdivision request made by the applicant. <br />Olsen said she made a rough calculation of other lots in the neighborhood with exception <br />of the lakeshore property. Of 18 lots, only 5 met the standard or were .88 acre or larger. <br />The remainder were substandard and similar in size to her property at .58 acres (Lots 55 <br />and 56). The hardcover of the property is at 11%. <br />Touve responded to Mabusth questions regarding the development of the 7 lots. He said <br />he w'ould be w illing to negotiate with the City, County and DNR regarding the building <br />size and wetlands. He informed Stoddard that the w'etlands have been delineated. He <br />noted the wetland area has changed over the years due to manmade efforts on the east end <br />with the building of a dam. A hill was pushed in by the road that changed the w etlhiids <br />resulting in it becoming larger than it had been originally. Touve felt he had an adequate <br />footprint with 25' to build w'ithout any variance with room for the 26' buffer from the <br />wetlands. The prol’'...i has arisen because the wetlands w'ere enlarged. Touve said he <br />would accept having a driveway to the east. He said it w'as his understanding that the City <br />was using the pond in the past, and the City implied that he would get this land back when <br />the sewer was installed. Touve said he was concerned that the substandardness of the lot <br />is a result of someone else's doing. The 7' drop from the culvert to his home has been <br />blocked off. He plans on adding cattails and dredging out the pond for ducks. If his plans <br />were approved, he then would be willing to give a portion of lot 57 to lots 55 and 56.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.