My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
04-13-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:50:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 9, 1998 <br />(#7 - #2327 Orono Development Ordinance Amendment - Continued) <br />Peterson asked if there was adequate parking to support this use. Gaffron indicated that <br />only two more spaces than for a retail store would be required for the use at the <br />applicant's property, which is met by his proposed site plan. <br />Kelley asked if the resolution as drafted would limit the conditional use for seating <br />purposes. Gaftron indicated it did not, and recommended a limitation be placed on <br />seating at this time. Barrett agreed. Gaffron said he was not sure what number of <br />seating should apply. <br />Jabbour informed the applicant to limit the use to distinguish it from the B-1 district uses <br />and market it as such. <br />Leisel Cox, owner of a coffee shop on CoRd 15, asked the Council to consider traffic. <br />She indicated that she has one customer every minute. Jabbour noted that the <br />ingress/egress was better on CoRd 19 than on CoRd 15. <br />Dillon said he had not contemplated the amount of seating. He noted that he had <br />requested outside seating be allowed as well. <br />Jabbour suggested tabling the application to flmher review the issue of seating. Kelley <br />suggested polling coffee shops to see how much seating is necessary. He did not feel it <br />should be incumbent upon the applicant to provide these figures. Kelley asked that Staff <br />determine the number of seats for inside and outside seating. Jabbour asked the applicant <br />to submit any seating plans they may have to Staff <br />Jabbour polled the Council for their support of the amendment to allow the coffee and <br />bagel shop use. All Council supported adding the use. Council agreed to have Staff <br />review seating and make a recommendation. <br />Hint said he was unclear what a bagel or coffee shop would include. He asked if such a <br />shop would sell orange juice and muffins. Gaffron said this has not been discussed. He <br />noted that most listed uses in the B-5 do not go into such detail. He did feel that some <br />definitions were necessary. Gaffron said he would speak with other cities and users. <br />Dillon said he thought similar shops have coolers from which they sell bottled water, <br />juice, and pop, and may have muffins as well. The primarj’ focus would be on bagels <br />Jabbour noted that the two uses are compatible and sometimes overlap. <br />Gaffron indicated that the code presents a problem with not setting very detailed <br />performance standards for each district or use He felt the potential problems that have <br />been noted suggest a need for setting such standards. <br />1 <br />M e
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.