Laserfiche WebLink
#2341 - Dan Anderson <br />March 6,1998 <br />Page 2 <br />Private road horizontal curve radius variance from 275' to 125' requested, based on <br />protection of drainfield sites, especially in Lot 1 <br />Existing residence on Lot 1 will remain, meets all setback requirements but needs a <br />new' septic system <br />Lots 1 and 2 technically are 'tlirough' lots, any future accessory structures need CUP <br />Lots 4 5 and 6 are the only riparian lots, and have buildable envelopes very restricted <br />by septic sites, lake setbacks and bluffimpact zone setbacks. Staff |s reeommCTdltie <br />,L, these three lots he exempt from awrinie lakeshnre setback requiremenu w ic <br />would have little or no positive protective impacts gtven the size, onentat.on. and <br />restrictions inherent in these lots. <br />Grading is proposed in Lot 6 to create a walkout building pad about 150' from lake <br />Neighborhood comments at Public Hearing resulted in PC recommendation to require <br />a 15* trail easement along east property boundary abutting Old Cn-stal ^ * <br />leave this as a potential trail corridor option even though it could negatively impact <br />septic sites and requiie significant retaining walls <br />Planning Commission recommended that a Tree. Woodland and Vegemtion <br />Preservation Easemcn be required to protect the unique wooden shoreline, ^pplic™ <br />has conceptually agreeed to grant such an easement. Such an <br />drafted by staff for Council and applicant review and comment (Exhibit D) <br />Hennepin County has requested additional T of right-of-way for Old Costal Bay <br />Road, fhe official Hennepin County Bike Trail Plan does not ^how »jrari here.^d <br />the Orono Comp Plan only calls out the need for the existing 66 of R.O.W. S <br />recommends no added R.O.W. be required. <br />]Mn <;tnrmwater ponding has b>-<-n proposed. This ls th? giggle criticnl f>hPrtCQm m& <br />nf |ht;> current proposal- in staff s OpiniQUi <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission first reviewed this in January as an 8-lot sketch plan with two private <br />mads SrriX av Applicant w as advised to make a number of revisions to that plan prior to <br />formal pfat applicatimi submittal, fhe plan was revised to 7 lots served by a single private road.