My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
02-23-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:18:02 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:10:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
527
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 15,1997 <br />(#10 - #2288 Jason Theis - Continued) <br />Stoddard asked Theis his opinion of the Staff recommendation. Theis said he was satisfied with the <br />recommendation. He is willing to scale back the driveway and working on correcting the slope. <br />Theis told Lindquist he would provide a grading plan. <br />Dressier indicated that engineering of the plan has not occurred. Berg asked that this be done. <br />Theis reported there is a 5' drop from the top of the existing driveway to the garage. He did not feel <br />that span was a problem with a 30' area. <br />McMillan ;.»*4icatcd there is a runoff problem existing along the retaining wall on the west side. <br />Theis said thfe problem exists by the stairs which need to be reconstructed. <br />With th(; of the driveway and flooding possibilities, Lindquist reconunended a 8% slcoe <br />instead of 10^^ <br />Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2288 for an attached <br />697 s.f. tuck under garage with living space above for hardcover and front setback variances subject <br />to Staff recommendation. The 10' side setback is to be met and a revised plan submitted showing <br />a 10 driveway meeting the hardcover in the 75-250' setback. The grading plan is to be provided <br />prior to Council review. Staff is to review flooding requirements. <br />Berg asked why the particular size as proposed. She was informed that there was only 372 s.f. above <br />grade and no bathroom on the main level. The second bedroom is only 6'x9', and the applicant <br />would like a larger master bedroom. <br />Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#11) #2290 ELAINE AND STEVE SILUS, 3235 CASCO CIRCLE - <br />VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING 11:22-11:57 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.