My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
02-23-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:18:02 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:10:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
527
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />>0 <br />minutes of the orono planning commission <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 18, 1997 <br />(US - #2206 Elaine and Steve Silus - Continued) <br />kee^the heiriif nf A '7'***' “ 7"'"" “ f«idence with basement in order tokeep the height of the structure low and present an aesthetically pleasing structure Thev <br />rfso are attempting to save the hackberty tree. He noted the pfoposX “ nof <br />extend My fiirther forward towards the lake than the existing house. The proposed house <br />k“" "'e garage by the street will be removed <br />cantilevered Sm a'rXr”' ^ <br />She suggested a tree <br />sti^ni^rinhe't " k ™ basement under the <br />^heTon the <br />Hawn '"fomied the appUcant of the series of requests being made in the area by oivners of <br />substandard loK The ordinances require that new construction meet the zoning <br />requirements. Hawn is concerned with the proposed overage in stnictural coverage Silus <br />“d sa »"ernative is to build a two-stoiy house, and they would prefer not to <br />Hawn said she was concerned with setting a precedent. <br />attempted to reduce the hardcover and reviewed the structure with an architect. <br />Mc^llan noted that while there is some improvement in hardcover, there is additional <br />ardcover in the 75-250’ setback and an increase in structural coverage. She felt the <br />There were no public comments. <br />McNIiUan asked if the proposal was reviewed with the neighbors. Silus said he discussed <br />ledi’rdfeom .he deXr <br />wa^proportb^ Sarage and driveway could be reduced. Silus felt the pL <br />iiiirfi ‘-i—f ii inif^vii' t*ti ri ^ t i t - - i n mil T ■■ 11 nil — HUM VMtv' t WM m ai fvtr aa i/»r^vatar»«tt i iBMii ■laii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.