Laserfiche WebLink
f . <br />Page 3. <br />Page 37. Note b) The new drawing contained show the proposal. <br />‘’®®'’ •* P'^oblem with enow removal in any prxor year. I can only hope that the Spilseth's, with a new <br />circuit r drxveway blacktopped to our mutual lot line, will conduct <br />their snow removal in the same respectful manner as we have. <br />Page 37. Note <br />temporary.^ Jay Richards was not aware that the wall he saw was <br />He never asked anyone who knew the correct facts <br />comiaaift^ comments were made to the planning <br />mmission being totally unxnformed or misinformed of the situation. <br />After being informed prior by Pat Spilseth that she <br />«eak with Builder, Bruce Bren, tried to <br />«™!!ni«Uons Sprlaeth's. They were totally against any <br />drainage situation has been improved from the <br />prior situation. All runoff has been addressed in the proposal. <br />facts of the construction project. <br />Page 39 -—Note a). This was one of the causes of the ensuing problem <br />been a construction site with all proper <br />present. When there was a problem with barriers, <br />HonSo happened very little, the problems were corrected within 24 <br />nours. ^ter that would have come within inches of the Spilseth's <br />door would have been from their own driveway, rtidewalk, and property. <br />Ail accommodatxons to runoff from the construction site have always <br />een addressed. We can not be held responsible for their own property