Laserfiche WebLink
4. <br />5. <br />2.The additions will not further encroach upon the average lakeshore setback <br />or diminish existing views. <br />3. No other variances are necessary in the construction the additions. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br />and welfare of the community. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby <br />grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1(B) to allow the <br />construction of a bay window over the existing deck on the lake side of the residence and a <br />dormer over the existing attached garage that encroach 61.6' and 38’ ahead of the average <br />lakeshore setback where no encroachment is allowed and 83’ is existing. <br />1.Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the <br />applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a <br />building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance <br />will expire on that date (February 23, 1998). <br />Page 2 of 4