My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
02-09-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 12:11:16 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 12:07:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />i’ <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 26,1998 <br />(#10) #2322 STEVEN N. FILIPS, 2570 THOROUGHBRED LANE - VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION NO. 4025 <br />Mrs. Filips was present. <br />Gaffron reported that the request is for a temporary variance for a 6' privacy fence along <br />Watertown Road. I he property is directly opposite i ruffula 1 rail resulting in glare from <br />headlights being received in the residence. He noted that the applicant had received <br />incorrect information, most likel> due to misunderstanding of the lot itself, regarding <br />fencing requirements. Gaffron said a fence on a through lot requires 50' setback for a <br />fence higher than 3-1/2 feet. The Council informed the applicant at a previous meeting <br />that the variance process was necessary. <br />Gaffron indicated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the temporary <br />fence to remain as a barrier for a 2-1/2 year time frame until vegetative screening has <br />matured. The fence would be required to be removed in June of 2000, or relocated to <br />become conforming. Findings are included in the draft resolution. The uniqueness of the <br />lot in relation to Truffiila Trail was noted. Addition of trees would be at the applicant's <br />discretion. <br />Mrs. Filips had no additional comments at this time. <br />Jabbour was informed that the normal application fee had boen charged to the applicant, <br />but based on the miscommunication, no after-the-fact fee was assessed. Jabbour felt if * <br />the City played a part in the mistake, perhaps no fee should be charged. <br />Kelle> asked if there were type 1 wetlands on the property. Gaffron said there were type <br />1 wetlands, but they were non-City protected. The covenants protecting these wetlands <br />do prohibit neighboring properties to the east from building any type of a berm. MCWD <br />and Corp of Engineer approval is required. <br />Mrs. Filips said they originally planned on building a berm and were informed that they <br />could not do so. Their goal is to block headlights fi’om shining into their home. <br />Kelley said he would like to condition any approval on the fencing being in conformity if <br />the residence is sold prior to the expiration of the time period allowed for the temporary <br />variance. Mrs. Filips agreed with stipulation of this condition. Council also voiced their <br />agreement. <br />Peterson was informed that Staff would be responsible for enforcement. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution No. 4025 for a temporary <br />variance with the condition that the fence be brought into compliance prior to closing if <br />the residence is sold within the time period of 2-1/2 years. Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.