My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
04-08-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2024 11:26:02 AM
Creation date
6/4/2024 11:21:03 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
558
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of OROINO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />2204 <br />D) The Orono ordinance governing set <br />structures from the "front yard* is geared to the "orwax <br />oositionino of a house to the street, i.e. the house norma-ly <br />faces the street and is located a very short distance from the <br />street. The ordinance is intended to help preserve the character <br />of the nci9hborhood os to not allow accessory structures <br />earaqcs, sheds, etc. in the -front yard- which <=•" have a <br />detrimental visual impact to Che neighborhood. **'®' <br />oUoertv is ooproximately 13.5 acres with the residence <br />overlooking a sn^all pond. The residence has its <br />Street (a full 400 feet from the street), and is <br />Pftir street. Clearly, this situation does not fall within <br />the original and normal intent of the ordinance and definition of <br />^f?oht K -ho caretaher house and the tennis structure ^ <br />be set back 125 and 150 feet, respectively, <br />There would be no detrimental visual impact on the neighborho^ <br />bv allowing a variance from the "front yard ordinance. Lan <br />scaping which would shield the structure from Fox Street has been <br />incorporated into the design. <br />altered ■••^lowing the variance-. <br />7. The proposeo caretaker residence meets all performance standards <br />of Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G). <br />B The City Council has considered this application including the <br />findings and recommendations of the Planning <br />City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect ^J® pifopose <br />variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />in this s^ing district; that granting the variance., would not <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in with the <br />spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br />City. <br />SSwr ?o neighberrng properties, nor will it d®P"®/t>V thV'Vro'^er?? <br />property values and that the proponed i®vel of '*•* ® . ^-Jino^Code <br />will be in Jeeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code <br />and ComprehensiVO Plan of the City. <br />Page 3 of 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.