Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />M0.. <br />-1 im< <br />P-' <br />S^r-m: <br />ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 11, 1991(#17)FACILITIES CONTINUED <br />Jabbour stated that the City should first find out which of <br />the Facility Conunittae members, if any, are still interest ad in <br />servin9 in that capacity. He said, "It will then be important <br />for Council to appoint nev; members and a chair." <br />Callahan s-.iggested that it may not be necessary for the <br />Facility Committee to continue with the same number of members it <br />initially had. He said, "Vie can proceed with the number of <br />members that are stiU interested, if that proves to be a <br />majority." <br />Jabbour indicated that he would like to see someone familiar <br />with Orono policies, as well as building knowledge, be appointed <br />to the Committee." <br />Bernhardson stated that the Council could send the latter <br />asking the members to indicate their interest in serving, but <br />that the role of the Committee has nv^t yet been defined. <br />Callahan suggested sending a letter inviting the Facility <br />Committee members to the upcoming work Session. He said, "We can <br />then see hov/ many members come to the meeting, and determine v/hat <br />we need to do from that point. At least those that attend will <br />get an understanding cr the direction we are taking." <br />Jabbour indicated that there may be people who wish to <br />continue serving on the Committee that cannot attend the meeting <br />for one reason or another. <br />Callahan suggested including a question at the bottom of the <br />letter asking thsm if they wish to continue, and to indicate yes <br />or no. He further suggested that a self-addressed stamped <br />envelope could be included to mail back their response. <br />It was the consensus of Council to accept the information <br />prasented by Staff, and to proceed as suggested by Callahan. <br />(il8)810lll WATER IIAIIAGBMBNT <br />Bernhardson asked Council if they wished to consider <br />undertaking an overall storm water management program for the <br />City at an approximate cost of $225,000. He said, "In the event <br />Council does not wish to consider such a project at this time, <br />perhaps you %fOuld like to consider alternate methods of financing <br />storm water projects." <br />Butler asked whether the City needs to have such a plan in <br />response to proposed legislation. <br />Bernhardson replied, "The City should have a storm water <br />management plan, though it is not yet mandatory to do so. I <br />- 24 - <br />f "iliiiiai'i-