My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
03-25-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2024 11:46:27 AM
Creation date
5/31/2024 11:41:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
\ <br />slowly. <br />Issue #2 - Impact of Navarre Heights on Togo Road - While^the <br />tils line"^oes exist towards Togo, as noted above/ the water from <br />Navarre Heights dissipates through a combination of drainage <br />towards Crystal Place and down towards the lake and evaporation <br />from the area on the north side of the tracks. While this area <br />needs to be cleaned out, this would be appropriate regardless of <br />whether the Navarre Heights project were developed or not. It is <br />estimated that this project could be done by a City crew in 2 <br />days. <br />The question related to Navarre Heights impact on Togo Road is <br />dependent on whether, with the proposed project in place, the <br />ff2l>er would move more quickly down to the ponding area by the <br />railroad tracks at a faster rate and, if in fact, that would <br />create a greater overflow of water through the culvert down <br />towards Togo Road. Based on elevations and estimated volume of <br />water from Livingston, it does not appear that this will have .an <br />^pppQCiable negative impact and, in fact, a sealing of this tile <br />line could be an option. <br />Public Hearing - If the Council decides to further pursue the <br />Navarre Heights project, a public hearing could be set for tne <br />November 26th meeting at which time plans and specs would be <br />completed and the project would be outlined by the Engineer, <br />notices put ir both the paper and sent to the individual property <br />owners and then the Council deciding whe':her they need to <br />undertake the project or not. One issue raised at -he October <br />22nd meeting was, at the point the Council orders t*.!e project, <br />whether they need a 3/5's or 4/5's vote. It is the City <br />Attorney’s initial opinion at the last meeting that given the <br />removal of the signatures, it would require a 4/5’s vote to <br />proceed in ordering the project. As you will note in the Project <br />schedule, which is Attachment C, that this actual ordering of the <br />project would be after bids were taken, the assessment hearing <br />held and the number of appeal waivers determined. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Drainage on Togo - <br />1. Accept the information <br />2. Direct Engineer to develop a storm plan for this area <br />3. Recommend individual property owners reinstate <br />previously existing drainage using swales etc. <br />4. Take no action <br />5. Table for further discussion <br />2. Impact of this project on Togo <br />lliiL.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.