My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-25-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
03-25-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2024 11:46:27 AM
Creation date
5/31/2024 11:41:26 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
541
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 20, 1991 <br />qoinq through that area to make the businesses thrive. I thin^ <br />Orono should help the City of Long L^.Ke work with their .ana use <br />planning to minimize the impact to the businesses. I oeiieve <br />that once discussions begin that include going cross country onto <br />a totally new alignment, and you take an env i ronment jimpact ot <br />what is currently felt along Highway 12 and transrer that^to a <br />1,000 or 2,000 yard corridor elsewhere, and you wrap the City of <br />Long Lake with freeways on both sides, ^ taat seems to be <br />irrational, long range planning. The City o*. Orono shouiu try to <br />negotiate with M-IDOT and the City of Long Lake to develop a <br />solution that would be as least painful as possible to all <br />parties concerned, while providing a safe, mayoe slow, but <br />consistent with our land use plan, type of highway. <br />It seems to me that once you go across Highway 6 or <br />elsewhere, and MNDOT draws a line on a map without having any <br />construction funds, that is irresponsible as it puts all j:he <br />property owners along that line in jeopardy. We need to uphold <br />our Comprehensive Plan. We don't have to apologize to other <br />cities for what we stand for. We are entitled to protect our <br />property values." <br />Rowlette disagreed with Bruce Carlson's comments about <br />business dieing if the freeway went around tne City of Long Lake. <br />She said, "Most business districts thrive when the freeway does <br />bypass them. Most of the traffic going through Long Lake does <br />not stop, but only adds to the congestion. Tnat traffic makes it <br />difficult for the local people to come into Long <br />business. Many people stay away because of the traffic. <br />Desyl Peterson, 4385 Chippewa Lane, agreed that the City of <br />Orono has an obligation to the City of Long Lake. She said, I <br />think the two cities should be consolidated. That is the <br />ultimate solution for a number of problems including police/nire <br />services, new public facilities and Highway 12. However, I do <br />not believe that will happen in time. W*» could just consider the <br />needs of Long Lake. The City of Long Lake has indicated their <br />concern about loss of tax base and the impact on their business <br />community. I thine. Orono has an obligation to work with Long <br />Lake to make sure that does not happen. It may be necessary to <br />relocate some of the businesses in Long Lake, but Orono could <br />assist with that by detaching portions of our City and giving <br />them to Long Lake. Orono may lose some tax base, but nothing <br />compared to what may be lost if another corridor is selected. <br />The area on Highway 12 near Otten Brothers may be an appropriate <br />area to detach." <br />Hartmut Ginnow stated that he is in the business o. <br />aesthetics and that in his opinion the City of Long Lake needs to <br />improve in that regard. He said, "In ny opinion, the City of <br />Long Lake could only benefit from having slight pressure put on <br />them to rebuild the downtown." <br />- 6 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.