Laserfiche WebLink
i,: <br />■ <br />>■ ■ <br />issues possibly in a segment by segment basis through the length <br />of the corridor. <br />Number of lanes of traffic <br />Speed to handle the traffic <br />Frequency of access onto the facility <br />Whether access is at grade or separated <br />Frequency of cross points of the facility (May not be <br />the S2une as access to the facility} <br />Issue #2 - Consideration of Recommend at ion - At some point the <br />Counc^ *needs to decide how they want to deal with the <br />recommendation. It may be app priate that this be dealt with <br />along the lines of the recommendation split between: <br />A. Goals and Objectives <br />B. Corridor Recommendation <br />Alternatives for consideration are: <br />Place on a regular Council agenda <br />Establish a separate workshop <br />Establish another public information discussion with <br />CounciImembers <br />Table awaiting further information as it relates to: <br />Further traffic analysis information <br />A discussion with the Long Lake Council under an <br />established format <br />Use the recommendation as a guideline to representatives <br />during the Highway 12 Committee meetings but not as an <br />officially adopted position <br />Adopt as presented <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Accept the information for further consideration. <br />2. Establish a process for further review. <br />3. Table until receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council discuss ways they <br />desire to review the recommendation once received and further <br />■'r.