Laserfiche WebLink
k <br />K«./ <br />f’- <br />t!-Ip-- <br />m <br />>'» <br />11' <br />U'f-; <br />&sQO; <br />m <br />N^i-' <br />CURRENT STATUS <br />The issue of altering roles was initially raised in 1988. <br />Subsequent responses from Planning Commission representatives <br />were set initially on 6/13 then delayed to 7/11. The reason not <br />addressed at that thime is not documented. The issue was revived <br />again for the 2/6/89 Joint Meeting. The apparent reaction of <br />RXanning Commission was a sense of having their role reduced <br />which was not the intent. The issue or amendment of roles was <br />dropped and was not an agenda item at the next joint meeting held <br />in May, 1969. <br />Applicable Documents <br />A. <br />B. <br />C. <br />0. <br />£. <br />P. <br />G. <br />H. <br />Z. <br />«7 • <br />K. <br />L. <br />Options Regarding Land Use Revisions Dated 4/1/88 <br />Council Minutes Excerpt 4/11/38 <br />Memo to Planning Commission 5/11/88 <br />Planning Commission Responsibilities Dated 1/31/89 <br />Planning Commission/City Council Joint Meeting Agenda <br />2/6/89 <br />Joint Council/Planning Commission of February 6, 1989 <br />Memo Dated 2/14/89 <br />Planning Commission/Cc Joint Meeting Memo Dated <br />4/5/89 <br />Planning Commission/Council Joint Meeting Agenda Dated <br />4/11/89 <br />Council Minutes Excerpt Dated 4/24/89 <br />Joint Counei1/Planning Commission Meeting Agenda 5/4/89 <br />Joint Council/Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 11/8/89 <br />Excerpts from Facilities Book: <br />1.) Site Analysis Section pg 2-5 <br />Original Evaluation Criteria Section pg 1-10 <br />Tours Section pg 1 <br />2.) <br />3.) <br />ri* ’ / . >