Laserfiche WebLink
i;. <br />Zoning File 11609 <br />February > ^991 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />AlloWid Hardcover » 4,178.5 s.f. or 25% , <br />^ Exist,i®%*^Bardcover * 5,093 s.f. or 30.4%* <br />‘ Propoi^ Hardcover ■ 5,392 s.f. or 32.2% <br />An increase of 299.2 s.f. or 1.79%*^ <br />*1 House ■ 1,376 + 145 s.f. * 1,521 s.f. <br />Garage • 612 s.f. <br />Drive “ 1,058 1,260 • 2,318 s.f. <br />Former Deck ■ 280 s.f. <br />Deck Steps ■ 52 s.f. <br />Front Steps • 42 s.f. <br />Landscape Area • 84 + 112 + 72 • 268 s.f. <br />*2 Eaves at 4' width above proposed deck not included in <br />hardcover calculation as City has never made final <br />determination for eaves in excess of l*j' width. <br />The second story deck (4*x48.8*) * 195.2 s.f. <br />The new deck (12*x32'} results in a net increase of 104 s.f. <br />of hardcover. <br />Plaase review Exhibits D1 through D2. The applicant's <br />written comments will help to provide Members with background on <br />the after-the-fact aspect oc this application. As with many <br />penalty applications, the owner is left to resolve the <br />unfortunate actions of a contractor. <br />Review Exhioxts G and H, the original 10*x28* deck recorded <br />In the assessor's records and the real estate photo of the <br />lakeside of the house -onfirm the existence of the deck at <br />approximately 10'jfli8*. Note the 1971 date of the assessor's <br />records confirms that the deck was constructed prior to the <br />lakttshor# ra^ulatlons o£ the City# The deck was replaced with a <br />new deck measuring 12'x32'. All but 3 of the footings are <br />considered new construction. <br />In reviewing aerial maps of the area and upon a site <br />inspection, there appears to be no problem with an average <br />lAkeshore setback. The second phase of this application Involves <br />the applicant's request for a second story deck or <br />the east side of the residence. The catwalk deck would link to <br />the second story lakeside deck providing a secondary access from <br />rsAr sscond story bodroon (rsviow Exhibit J)# Applicant is <br />concerned that if fire comes up the centrally located staircase, <br />only available egress from the second floor rear bedroom is <br />at the patio doors leading to lakeside deck. As <br />in the factual findings, the 4' overhang has not been included in <br />the hardcover calculations.