Laserfiche WebLink
• • • <br />r\\, <br />L CITY <br />■ ORONa <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <br />41. The City Council cannot grant a use variance, pursuant <br />to Minnesota Statute Section 463.367, Subdivision 6, Any <br />future use of the property must be for a permitted use in <br />the LR-IA zoning district. <br />42. In review of specific findings noted above, it is <br />apparent that the applicant had received adequate notice <br />advising of the expiration of the 1987 conditional use <br />permit. The 1987 conditional use permit expired June 8, <br />1988. The current application for the commercial use of the <br />property was filed January 24, 1930. <br />43, The property can be put to a reasonable allowed use. <br />It can be combined with the adjacent residential property <br />also owned by applicant but applicant has failed to meet <br />with staff to discuss options for residential use of the <br />property. <br />44. The intent of the application is cor > ;y to the intent <br />of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. <br />45. The granting of this conditional use permit and <br />variance would establish an adverse precedent in the City. <br />46. T’he applicant had full and complete knowledge of his <br />rights and risks regarding the non-conforming use of this <br />property, any alleged hardship appears to be self-imposed. <br />FURTHBRMORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD that the City of Orono <br />continues to encourage the applicant to work with the City to <br />develop a reasonable residential use on the property. If <br />dimensional variances are required to accommodate such <br />residential use, the City Council may consider the granting of <br />reasonably needed variances to install such use. <br />Page 12 of 13 <br />f <br />i... . <br />■