Laserfiche WebLink
1. Common versus so I i t site - Attachment 3 is a draft <br />related to the site, both ones <br />issues in the <br />and <br />summary of the is.«ues <br />that are quantifiable together related <br />areas organizational development, location <br />compatibility of land uses. It is requested <br />Council indicate other issues they may think <br />relevant or questions as to information presented. <br />Boarman is reviewing the draft. <br />that <br />are <br />Jack <br />2. Neiqhborhood questionaire - A questionaire is being <br />draft for Council review. The questionaire will attempt <br />to give background and alternatives that would be <br />helpful to the neighborhood in making an informed <br />decision. If Council desires to undertake alternative <br />design for the Crystal Bay site, such designs would be <br />most helpful to give a perspective on how the building <br />would fit. <br />3. Storage of Public Works ecuipment - As mentioned at <br />the January 28th meeting, staff has been exploring what <br />to do with the current "Lumber Shed" and the equipment <br />stored therein. Staff feels that the building may be on <br />the verge of "implosion" on its own and has been <br />researching options related to that. These options are <br />as follows; <br />A. Status Quo - Continue with the utilization of <br />the current structure but continue to close off <br />areas that are unsafe. <br />B. Renting of Alternative Space - Staff has been <br />working over the last 2 months to determine what <br />space may be available of at least 15,225 square <br />footage and the only rental square footage of <br />significance in the area is in Tonka Bay, near the <br />NSP facility. It is estimated that to rent the <br />sole building there, which would be storage but <br />large enough to allow the operation to work out of <br />that facility on an interim basis, would be about <br />$50,000 a year plus utilities. This facility <br />however, would not equate to the longterm needs and <br />would result in much jockeying of equipment and <br />outdoor storage to make usable together with <br />lacking many of the offices and shops that are felt <br />needed on a longterm basis for the City. <br />C. Tear Down Existing Faci1 ity, Undertake Outdoor <br />Storage of Current Indoor Storage Materials - Under <br />this option the City would fence in the parking lot <br />next to the lumber shed area, together with <br />utilizing the fenced in area under the Navarre <br />water tower for storage of trucks and other <br />equipment outside until a new facility was