My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-11-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
03-11-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2024 2:47:22 PM
Creation date
5/24/2024 2:42:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
531
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Fr <br />•E <br />F. <br />such an exchange. <br />4. Connection Charges - <br />A. A; >unt - The City is currently exploring what number <br />of units would be appropriate to this property. <br />B. Give that the Country Club is constructing a rather <br />extensive line from their Club House to a connection and <br />uses only a small portion of the line and a lift station <br />it may be more appropriate to only charge a use charge <br />based on an established number of units. <br />C. Precedence for others properties - The issue discussed <br />was if allowing Woodhill to hook up creates a precedence <br />in the following situations. <br />1. Properties which are in the rural zone that have <br />not previously been part of a project. <br />2. Properties previously allowed to be hooked up^ but <br />who chose not to. <br />One way to differentiate this is the fact that it is in another <br />City and that Orono has had properties such as the following that <br />have connected into systems of other Cities: <br />Wayzata - Herrick Circle, West Ferndale Road, <br />Chevy Chase <br />L<M)9 Lake <br />#1 Rural Areas w uThe properties that are in the rural area should not have a <br />precendence because of this line because it is a property that <br />currently is within the muSA line and rural properties would <br />require MUSA line extension the Comprehensive Plan amendment in <br />order to permit* <br />t2 Properties able to Participate , ^ w, -,. ..foe the properties which previously had the ability to get <br />into a project# but chose not to# it was indicated <br />properties were told at that point that they would never be able <br />to join in the project. Council can therefore decide whether <br />they would amend that policy to allow those to be included or <br />chose to enforce the policy previously stated. To the best of <br />staff's recollection however, none of Ull <br />brought such a request in the last 5 years (although they have <br />inquired as to the ifexplore) and those requests could be dealt with at that time. If <br />they would have been permitted in the project originally it may <br />be difficult to exclude them at this point. <br />C. Use of Monies from Connection Monies - For P^®P®tties <br />allowing to previously existing assessment the City
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.