Laserfiche WebLink
trI <br />k <br />§ <br />h <br />■ <br />^-f *4=f'fktl’t.' <br />2491.i.3 <br />TO: <br />FBOM: <br />OMS: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat oiS <br />/ <br />February 4, 1991 <br />80BJ1CT: Canine Program <br />^^l;achttentt A. Canine Program Memo Dated 1/31/ 91 <br />ISSUE • Update Council regarding stratus of the canine program* <br />INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment A despite the <br />cannot go back for training.) As a result the City does have a <br />inSnxtftS ’ib. city ^uld b. -tl..* *>y <br />Fisehenich becoming familiar with a new dog. A* <br />dollars are concerned there should not be an additional cost. <br />While there would be no guarantee that a new dog would be <br />ameanable to drug training it would obviously give another <br />possibility of getting another dog that could be <br />If a new dog was brought on board Baron would be retired and <br />pladed in a suitable hone. (Either the original owner or sold to <br />a security firm.) <br />RECOMMBNDATIM - This isQ-iv fckfa tFae. Unless Council has objections# start win go <br />ahead with a new dog with Officer Fisehenich training him in the <br />Sn* (It .bo»ld b. not.d that 0.n ap.nt only J day. <br />out of the two week program with Baron in drug training.) <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _» the CouncU. <br />information and direction that staff has taken regarding the <br />canine program* Ayes Nays <br />cc: Chief KilboOfficer Fisehenich