My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RE: landscaping/tennis court
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bohns Point Road
>
1595 Bohns Point Road - PID: 08-117-23-44-0024
>
Correspondence
>
RE: landscaping/tennis court
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:48:32 PM
Creation date
10/21/2015 12:41:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1595
Street Name
Bohns Point
Street Type
Road
Address
1595 Bohns Point Rd
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0811723440024
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�o� <br /> �� � <br /> ,o o� � <br /> _ ����� <br /> C ITY of ORONO <br /> ,� �,'�'r��, �, �� <br /> � � ` !� ;� Municipal Offices <br /> � "� <br /> �;, <br /> �` ,� i.., �'ti',� <br /> ��.� ��� � �� � i� Street Address: Mailing Address: <br /> �����C'EggO� 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 <br /> ���� " Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 <br /> September 4, 1996 <br /> Clark Winslow <br /> 1595 Bohns Point Road <br /> Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 <br /> Dear Clark: <br /> Thank you for your letter of August 29th reviewing the scope of the tennis court project and the <br /> survey of property interests in Lots 10 and 11, Auditor's Subdivision 349. <br /> As I noted in our earlier phone conversations, such a project would require variance approval by the <br /> City as a tennis court is considered an accessory structure. Orono code requires that a principal <br /> structure be located on the same property as the accessory structure. The code does not address the <br /> shared use of an accessory structure by multiple land owners of an undeveloped lot. <br /> Your letter reveals that you have not heard from Mike Cashman(.22 interest)nor Randy Green(.11 <br /> interest). From your letter, I gather you have already received negative responses from some other <br /> land owners. This may be of issue for the City in the filing of the formal variance application. Staff <br /> may need to consult with the City Attorney on this matter. <br /> In earlier conversations I had assumed that the property owners contacted had voiced approval of <br /> the proposed improvements. Your covenants may define the number of votes needed to confirm an <br /> action on the part of the joint land owners, unfortunately, at this time, I am not certain how this may <br /> affect your application. My hope is that by the time of the filing of the variance application you will <br /> have unanimous approval of all land owners. <br /> We have also discussed some of the information needed to accompany your variance application as <br /> follows: <br /> 1. Survey/site plan locating all improvements and plantings. <br /> 2. Topographic information locating existing and proposed contours. <br /> 3. Tennis court structure must meet the 35' setback from all lot lines or a second <br /> variance would be required. <br /> 4. Elevations of structure. <br /> Telephone (612) 473-'7357 • FAX 473-0510 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.