My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 11:12:41 AM
Creation date
5/20/2024 11:07:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
603
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1600 <br />November 16, 1990 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />A) Can the receiving addition be relocated on building <br />. . . consider elevations on the east side yard? <br />Would the location on the east be functional? <br />B) Would a setback of 5' tc a side yard rather than a <br />10’ street side yard be r.cre acceptable? There is <br />little room for a 28' addition at southeast corner. <br />C) What impact would there be on drainage facilities <br />approved in 1976? Certainly the expansion at the <br />southeast corner would require major land alterations. <br />D) The 30’ wide utility easement prevents all <br />expansion to north. <br />It may be timely to remind Members that this lot was <br />approved in 1976 for development by Super Value. In the original <br />proposal, setback variances were granted for the new construction <br />because of the placement of the 30* sewer utility easement that <br />cuts the commercial zoned portion of the property in half placing <br />severe limitations on expansion. Review Exhibit I, the City was <br />made aware of the future plan of Super Value to expand to the <br />west. The extensive minutes of those earlier reviews address <br />that future wwhdijfision. <br />4. What is Planning Commission ’s position on parking <br />requirements and need for a 26 stall variance per Orono <br />Code? <br />Once again, please review methods of determining parking <br />needs set forth in applicant's addendum (Exhibit D). <br />A) What is a reasonable or acceptable parking stall <br />variance? <br />B) What the Planning Commission position if the <br />applicant was asked to execute an agreement to expand <br />parking if the need arises along the east lot line? <br />Review the elevations along the east lot line. Note <br />what types of land alteratons would be involved with <br />that expansion. If Kelly Avenue is vacated at the <br />north, parking could be expanded on the west side with <br />the additional 33*. <br />C) What about limiting all other users of the parking <br />lot (i.e. special sales, satellite/photo pickup <br />structures) and any others Planning Commission Members <br />have noted in the past.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.