02-11-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1600 November 16, 1990 Page 2 of 6 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - Exhibit E - Exhibit F - Exhibit G - Exhibit H - Exhibit 1 - Exhibit J - Exhibit K - Exhibit L - Exhibit M - Exhibit N - FThihit Q — Exhibit P - Application Property Owners List Plat Map Applicant's Analysis of Parking Needs Applicant's Engineer's Letter 11/7/90 Applicant's Engineer's Letter 11/9/90 Existing Drainage Plan (Kelly Ave) Kelly Avenue Drainage Report - 1976 Zoning District Boundaries Rezoning Ordinance Approved 3/8/76 Resolution 3/8/76 Navarre Redevelopment Sketches Drainage Plan Approved 8/26-”^ ^ Fixtures/Floor Plan Pialliiiliigry Site Plan——^ Survey History of Property - The property was formally owned by IDS Properties. The property as currently configured was subdivided in 1976 for sale to Super Value Inc. to build a new super market. Concurrent with the subdivision was a rezoning and commercial site plan application for Super Value (refer to Exhibits I, J and K). The rezoning of approximately a 50' corridor located just to the north of the 100' conservation easement was to be rezoned to commercial. Staff has found taht the 50' corridor is still zoned LR-IB. The applicant was to fulfill certain conditions, specifically to complete construction within 2 years (1976 to 1978), completion of certain drainage improvements and execution of an easement over an exi*:ting sewer line. Note 30' easement that intersects property running east to west. The applicant fulfulled all of the obligations to the City, but, unfortunately, the City failed to formally rezone the 50' wide corridor that the present commercial building is located. Part of this review will be to realign and correct the zoning boundary discrepancy. During the commercial site plan review, the City granted a side setback variance of 15 ’ to the Kelly Avenue lot line. Please note the zoning code requires a 100' setback if the property abuts a residential zone. the southern portions of the commercial building are located adjacent to an LR-IB zoning district. Rather than rezoning the remaining 100' corridor on the south side of the property, the City opted to retain the LR-IB zone and asked for an open space/conservation easement over the corridor so that no construction could ever take place within the 100* required setback area (permanently assuring the 100' buffer to the residential zone to the south). Although not noted in that early review, ^0' would have been required from the east lot line as there is only ^ 25' setback from the southeast corner of the existing building the commercial side lot line. Ss-'