My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 11:12:41 AM
Creation date
5/20/2024 11:07:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
603
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RBSOLOTION 6RANTIRG <br />VARIAHCES TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.42, SUBDIVISION 7 (G) AND <br />SECTION 1^.61, SUBDIVISION 10 (O) <br />FILE #1600 <br />WHEREAS, Richard Bloomquist (hereinafter "the <br />applicant") has an interest in the property located at 3333 <br />Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and <br />legally described as follows: <br />Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br />variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section IC.42^ Subdivision 7 <br />(G) to permit the construction of a 75' wide addition to be <br />located 10* from the west side lot line instead of the required <br />100'; and a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, <br />Subdivision 10 (O) seelcing approval of a total of lu8 parking <br />stalls where based on the total net floor area, the expanded use <br />would require 134 stalls. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1600 <br />2. The property is located in the B-3 Commercial Shopping <br />District and the LR-IB Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br />District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on November 19, 1990 and January 22, 1991 and recommended <br />approval of the proposed variances based upon the following <br />findings: <br />A) A 30' wide utility easement divides the ; roperty in <br />half forcing applicant to either expand east or west. <br />A northward addition would not be allowed to encroach <br />over the utility easement. <br />B) The topography to the east prohibits feasible <br />expansion in light of the impact on adjacent property <br />and improvements on that property. <br />Page 1 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.