My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
02-11-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 11:12:41 AM
Creation date
5/20/2024 11:07:13 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
603
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I- <br />i;-.' <br />-r <br />A RBSOLDTION GRANTING <br />APTER-THE-PACT VARIANCES TO <br />MONICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 & 2 AND <br />SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 <br />PILE #1611 <br />WHEREAS, Bruce and Camille Curtiss (hereinafter "the <br />applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1920 <br />Fagerness Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter <br />"City") and legally described as follows; <br />Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property")? and <br />WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City <br />after-the-fact variances to Municipal Zoninc Code Section 10.22, <br />Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit <br />the construction of an upper level deck constituting structure <br />and hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no <br />structure or hardcover is normally allowed. <br />HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1611. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family <br />Lalceshore Residential Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on January 22, 1991, and recommended approval of the <br />proposed after-the-fact variances based upon the following <br />findings: <br />A) The newly constructed deck is in approximately the <br />same configuration and same location as a previously <br />existing deck which was removed immediately prior to <br />this new construction, being located 25* from the <br />shoreline. Based on documentation appearing in City <br />files, it appears likely that the new deck has not <br />increased hardcover on the property beyond that which <br />previously existed, and the new deck is located no <br />closer to the lakeshore than the previously existing <br />deck. <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.