Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />i . <br />A' <br />,\ <br />I i '" <br />I II OF <br />^3RQNa <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO.2769 <br />1)Lakeshcre <br />Required <br />Existing <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />Proposed <br />setback: <br />« 75' <br />Principal Structure <br />Accessory structure <br />Principal Structure <br />Accessory Structure <br />55 ' <br />10' <br />61' <br />59'(second level deck <br />extends 2' beyond lakefrcnt of principal <br />res dence) <br />Variance; <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />Existing <br />Procosed <br />Principal Structure » 20' <br />Principal Structure *= 14' <br />Accessory Structure * 65' <br />Accesscrv Structure « 16' <br />or 26% <br />or 18.6% <br />or 86% <br />or 21% (second story <br />upper level deck) <br />2)Hardcover within the 0-75' Setback .^rea: <br />Allowed = 0 s.f. <br />Existing = 926 s.f. or 15 <br />Proposed = 812 s.f. or 13 <br />Total Reduction = 2.5% <br />8% <br />5% <br />B) The application involves no need for a hardcover variance <br />within the 75-250' setback area as applicant proposes removal or <br />major portions of existing hardcover within the 75-250' setback <br />area. <br />C) The use of the existing foundation will provide less of an <br />impact on the lakeshore property. <br />D) The original structure was placed on the property prior to <br />current standards for lakeshore development. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the <br />findings and recommendations cf the Planning Commission, reports by <br />City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br />variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />5, The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br />property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br />property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would <br />not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve <br />as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a <br />substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping <br />with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br />of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5