Laserfiche WebLink
MTHTTTFS OF RB60UUR OROHO COUNCIL HEBTIH6 MARCH 13» 1989 <br />N <br />"T^ <br />.irr <br />f __ <br />^#1381 JACK RHODE <br />/ 1890 SHAOtWOOD ROAD <br />7ARXASCBS <br />RBSOLOnOH #2593 <br />ir. Rhode was present for this matter <br />Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained that Mr. <br />Rhode was requesting hardcover and lakeshore setback variances <br />for total reconstruction of a residence using the existing <br />foundation. The reconstruction will result in a reduction of <br />hardcover within the 0-75’ setback zone, however, approval is <br />jj®quixad because of the new construction* <br />There were no questions or comments on behalf of Mr. Rhode <br />or the Council. <br />It was moved by CounciImember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #259 3, approving t.he <br />l^](0shore setback and hardcover variances. Motion, Ayes = 4, <br />Nays-0, Notion passed. <br />#1382 JOHN ROGERS <br />755 TONKAWA ROAD <br />VARIANCESMr. Rogers was present, as was his Landscape Architect, Mark <br />Lumry. <br />As it was explained by Acting City Administrator Gerhardson, <br />the applicant was seeking hardcover and lakeshore setback <br />variances to allow the conversion of a patio into structural <br />hardcover. This conversion would provide a connection between <br />the existing house and the existing guesthouse. The Planning <br />Conunission, at their February 21, 1989 meeting, approved this <br />application on a 3 to 2 vote. <br />Mr. Lumry informed the Council that he had reviewed the <br />various drainage plans suggested by the City Engineer. Assistant <br />Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron provided the specific <br />details involved with the drainage plans. The question is <br />whether to allow a drainage pipe to be <br />water from the 75-250* zone and discharge it 40* from the lake on <br />a steep slope. Other options would be to end the pipe prior to <br />the slope so that discharge would occur on a flat <br />route the pipe across the property so it will discharge behi»' <br />the 75* line. <br />Mr. Lumry explained that the current drainage pattern brings <br />water down across an existing patio and is then funneled * <br />atairway in the 0—75* zone. The runoff is currently <br />discharged in the same area it would be if the pipe brought it to <br />the slope. Arteka's Civil Engineer calculated that there would <br />be .25 cubic feet of water per second running through the pipe in <br />the event of the 100-year storm. <br />Councilmember Goetten questioned the hardship involved with <br />L'-;' ^ V