Laserfiche WebLink
i . <br />',1 <br />v; <br />T.H. 12 Corridor Study <br />Citizen’s Committee Minutes <br />Maple Plain City Hall <br />November 13, 1990 <br />(Approved December 18. 1990) <br />Members Present: S. Hay, G. Johnson. G. Cook. D. Hamiiion. T. Wenz. E. Winston <br />Others Present: L Dallam, R. Harris, D. Hayes. T. Code. V. Innis. B. Marolf, C. Johnson, <br />K. i^’ordin, J. Behrman, L. Massopust, T. Kuller, S. Ross, I’eterson, J. Peterson, E. <br />Callahan, J&J Lane. A. Martinez, H. Carlson <br />S. Hay called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. The minutes from the October 16ih <br />meeting were approved as submitted. <br />L. Dallam updated the Committee on the status of alternatives (layouts). He n* . -)ned <br />that an old study alignment, which passes around the southern boundary of Long . was <br />added (green line) based on input from the committee. The orange lines represent possible <br />connections between routes to create variations on the alternatives - there are a total of at <br />least 15 possible alte^'natives. <br />Dallam requested that representatives from the Citizen’s Committee coordinate with their <br />respective jurisdictional representatives from the other committees and recommend <br />alignment shifts that may be necessary as a result of any "special features" that HNTB was <br />unaware of in the mapping of the layouts. (Technical Committee members have large scale <br />maps for this purpose). Special features may include locally important structures or natural <br />areas, such as public structures, properties that are potentially eligible for the National <br />Register of Historic Places, woodlands and scenic areas. Dallam said as the corridors are <br />screened, remaining alternatives will then become more "fixed ” for the EIS. The consultant <br />currently has data on wetlands, park and recreation areas, schools, and cemeteries, and will <br />be collecting additional data for residential and commercial land uses. Features such as <br />fiumlands covenanted in Agricultural Preserves, "Big Woods" tree communities, and other <br />special features (as identified by the committees) will complete the land use inventory for <br />the map overlays. <br />G. Cook asked when people will be requested to select corridors for further study. Dallam <br />responded that this will occur after the scoping public meeting. The purpose of coordinating <br />committee members is to obtain a single set of minor alignment shifts and special features <br />for each community. The modified corridors are then the corridors included in the scoping <br />document for public review and comment. <br />TrafiBc forecasts were then discussed. Hay reponed that Mn/DOT is currently preparing <br />forecasts and hopes to have them completed in December. The forecasts will include major <br />crossings of TH 12, and county roads, and are based on the Metro Council ’s forecasting <br />model for 2010. (Dallam explained how the model works •• that a "window is cut out ” of <br />the regional model and divided into zones and subzones based on 2010 population and