Laserfiche WebLink
r 12690.: <br />/l77^‘MexJT /\ <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATS: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^t <br />December 6, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Lake Use and Management <br />Attachment: A. Proposed Resolution of Opposition <br />B. LMCD Memo Dated 11/20/90 <br />ISSUE - Determine level of support by Council for Attachment A. <br />INTRODUCTION - In anticipation of tne LMCD orientation meeting of <br />Wednesday, December 12, 1990, seven of the cities met at Wayzata <br />City Hail on December 6th with a representative of LMCD also in <br />attendance. In attendance from Orono were Ed Callahan, Gabriel <br />Jabbour and myself. <br />j^fter discussion of concerns and possible avenues of action the <br />ji^^jjjched resolution was developed at the meeting to express the <br />concerns of the group together with the possible addition of <br />Victoria. Orono did indicate that it did have concerns with the <br />plan beyond those outlined in the resolution. <br />jg has ’‘-f^en reguested by Orono that Wayzata tape the presentation <br />in theiz Council Chambers on December 12, 1990. This could allow <br />for future reference if needed. <br />As part of the discussion it is anticipated that the group would: <br />a.) Solicits the support of other LMCD members not in <br />attendance. <br />b.) Meet with Legislature and Metro Council <br />representatives on various aspects regarding the plan. <br />c.) Ascertain to see if the plan can be reconsidered. <br />d.) Determine if the individual desires to alter its <br />representation. <br />In addition the group would later review whether it is <br />appropriate to do anything as to the financial contributions to <br />LMCD • <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Adopt as presented <br />2. Amend and adopt. <br />3. Table.