Laserfiche WebLink
f TO: <br />PROM: <br />DATE: <br />12219(. / <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato <br />January 9, 199i <br />SUBJECT: LMCD Sftoreland Regulations and Comprehensive Plan <br />Attachment:A. Shoreland Regulation Memo Dated 12/6/90 <br />(Memo Only) <br />B. Proposed Shoreland Work Plan <br />C. LMCD Letter Dated 12/17/90 <br />D. LMCD Memo Dated 12/19/90 <br />E. DNR Shoreland Regulations Excerpts Dated 7/3/89 <br />F. DNR Letter Dated 12/27/90 <br />ISSUE - Present to Council information regarding the following <br />matters: <br />A. Update the status of LMCD's Comprehensive Plan. <br />B. Review actions proposed by LMCD members regarding <br />LMCD Comprehensive Plan. <br />C. Update Council on current, action related to <br />shoreland regulations. <br />INTRODUCTION - Since the Council's meeting on December 10, 1990 <br />LMCD held their meeting on December 1 2, 1990 to explain the <br />process of shoreland regulation adoption to those cities who are <br />participating with them in the shoreland regulation process. At <br />that meeting LMCD announced that they will be engaging a <br />consultant to assist them in a review of the shoreland regulation <br />and proposals from the participating cities. The person selected <br />was previously an employee of the Department of Natural Resources <br />who had worked on the initial proposals for the shoreland <br />regulations which were issued in 1989. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Issue #1 - Update the Status - LMCD continues to go forward with <br />the funding from the DNR despite the fact that several <br />communities have indicated that they will not participate with <br />LMCD in the matter. <br />LMCD had indicated to the City prior to that meeting, that the <br />City may not be able to work on their own or that the flexibility <br />the DNR could exercise through the LMCD may not be available to <br />the City of Orono if it were to proceed separately. It was <br />indicated to LMCD that, in fact, the city had been directed by <br />their own proposed agreement from 6/90 to work with DNR <br />separately for its lakes apart from Lake Minnetonka and that <br />LMCD's regulations in some instances were more stringent than