My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1991
>
01-14-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2024 10:39:28 AM
Creation date
5/13/2024 10:35:58 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
*'. <br />s- <br />h4 <br />L'. <br />V>I <br />LV <br />14r- <br />i! ^ <br />ft;’ <br />:l:v <br />ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1473-KELLY CONTINUED <br />fjQt 6xtend into the 0-75' setback area. He stated that the <br />Planning Commission had originally recommended denial. However, <br />they indicated that if the size of the deck were reduced, that <br />they would recommend approval. <br />iiabusth added, "When the applicant first presented the <br />revissd plan to the Council, she had followed all of the <br />^^rectiver, from the Planning Commission. When this matter was <br />reviewed by Council on June 23rd, the applicant was given further <br />direction. Since that meeting, a revised survey has been <br />provided and reflects a realignment of the 250' setback line. <br />That is why there was a discrepancy in the amount of bituminous <br />hardcover in the 75-250* setback area. The applicant is now <br />proposing to reduce hardcover to 48.8%. ' Mabusth asked Mr. <br />Johnson if the applicant is willing to remove landscape plastic <br />located in the 250-5C0' setback area. <br />Mr. Johnson replied, "The only thing that is in that area is <br />a shed that was there when Ms. Kelly moved in. Nothing has been <br />done in the 250-500’ setback area and we prefer not to because of <br />the shed, which is used for storage. We would ask that the <br />250-500' setback area remain as is." <br />Mayor Grabek stated that in his opinion the applicant has <br />tried to work with the City. He added that he had originally <br />indicated that he did not object to the four foot encroachment of <br />the average setback line. <br />Peterson concurred with Mayor Grabek. She said, "I had <br />originally voted to conceptually deny this application. However, <br />I do not feel that the average lakeshore setback encroachment is <br />as significant an issue, in light of the hardcover reductions now <br />proposed.” <br />Goetten stated that she still objected to the removal of <br />non-structural hardcover in exchange for structural hardcover. <br />She said, "I would like to see some structural hardcover removed. <br />I am not sure what removing plastic really accomplishes. I do <br />not object to the four foot encroachment of the average lakeshore <br />setback. However, this lot already has an excess of hardcover <br />and I would like to see an equivalent amount of structural <br />hardcover removed for what the deck will add.” <br />Callahan commented that the issue of hardcover should be <br />reviewed in its entirety by the new Council. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Peterson, to adopt <br />Naeolution #2915, approving the after-the-fact Variances to <br />construct a deck. Motion, Ayes-3, Goetten, Nay. Motion passed. <br />- 5 - <br />Li.. jr:. . . |
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.