Laserfiche WebLink
r’-' <br />K. <br />I-I <br />■I <br />% <br />r <br />k <br />• * ^ m <br />not eo«rcod into antaring into the subdivision agreement with the <br />City. If Wear had any serious doubts about dedicating a portion of <br />the ciibdivision land for public use as a load, he could have <br />challenged tne City’s requirements before filing the final pl.it <br />through various remedies, including mandanius. cettiocari. injunction. <br />or declaratory judgment. <br />Similarly, no purchaser of a subdivision lot has standing tu <br />challenge the City of Orono's action to open the easement foi public <br />use. **Statutory dedication is one by plat executed and recorded by <br />statute." Popp V. County of Winena. 430 N.W.Zd 19. 23 (Minn. Ct. <br />(fiitinfl <br />33 M.W.2d 606. 608 (1949)). The filing of the plat puts all <br />purchasers on notice that certain lands have been dedicated fur <br />public uses. "When a conveyance is made with reference to a plat <br />sll lot owners are deemed to have full 'tnowledge and notice of <br />everything appearing on the plat.The purchaser assumes all <br />rights and easements represented in the plat.** id. (citations <br />omi tted). <br />Further research will have to be conducted to ascertain whsf <br />the purchase agreement between Wear and a subdivision lot purchaser <br />sctuslly stated. Zt is probable that the purchase agreements <br />incorporated the plat by refecenrj. if this assumption is correct. <br />then eny of the purchasers of subdivision lots would lack standing to <br />challenge the City's decision to construct roads over the eas«mwtii.:4 <br />for public use. <br />3* iiq taking occurs whan the City-qC-U jcouq CQnatgU C.tP. p.ubHC <br />rqpdn aweg the enhlio nUAmeat .