Laserfiche WebLink
Date: May 13, 2024 Item: 13 <br />Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner <br />Section: Consent Agenda <br /> <br />Title: #LA23-000062, 3838 Cherry Ave, After-the-Fact Conditional Use Permit - <br />Resolution No. 7477 <br /> <br /> <br />1.Purpose: <br />The applicant is requesting consideration for after-the-fact approval of a conditional use permit to <br />construct new lakeside retaining walls and a lake access stair, requiring walls. <br />2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: <br />The application was received on October 30, 2023, and considered to be complete on December 7, <br />2023. The 60-day review period was extended once by staff and has been extended an additional <br />60-days at the request of the applicant. The review timeline will now expire on June 4, 2024. <br />3.Background: <br />Construction on the new home began in October of 2023. Following the demolition of the existing <br />home, the contractor began installing rip rap under a permit from the MCWD. While installing rip <br />rap, the contractor removed the entirety of the lake slope vegetation including trees, the existing <br />wooden lake access stair, the existing stone walls, and debris. In addition to the rip rap work, they <br />began installing a new stone slab lake access stair and new angular boulder retaining walls. <br />Because the City had not issued a permit for the work on the lake slope, staff issued a Stop Work <br />order and began working with the contractor to bring the property into compliance. <br /> <br />This application was reviewed at the January 16, 2024, and April 22nd Planning Commission <br />meetings. The homeowner and contractor were directed to provide additional supporting <br />documentation from a professional engineer regarding the proposed retaining walls and slope <br />stabilization. The staff reports for each meeting (linked above) contain a full background and <br />detailed analysis of the proposal. <br /> <br />Analysis of an after-the-fact condition is challenging as some of the factors for evaluation can be <br />missing or altered. In this situation, the owner has provided photos and a survey providing some <br />detail about the slope and pre-existing walls before their removal. According to the owner's <br />engineer, the proposed new walls in the proposed configuration are necessary and are placed <br />similarly to the previously existing walls which were failing. The owner has demonstrated that the <br />proposed plan is necessary to replace an aging wall system. The new walls and proposed landscape <br />plan should sufficiently stabilize the slope. <br />4.Planning Commission Vote and Comment: <br />On April 15, 2024, the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 in favor of approval of the after-the-fact <br />conditional use permit for the lakeside retaining wall improvements. <br />5.Public Comment: <br />Staff has received phone calls from interested neighbors with questions about this project. No <br />comments have been submitted. <br />AGENDA ITEM <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />94