Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD DECEMBER 14, 1992 <br />ZONING FILES #1778 & #1779 - CONT. <br />Mayor Peterson interpreted the adopted resolution to condition <br />approval of a subdivision on the proposal meeting all current <br />standards. She stated she was hard pressed to approve a lot area <br />variance with a subdivision. She asked what makes this request <br />different and/or the same as other subdivisions requested. <br />Gaffron stated the Council would be making a compromise to the <br />street standards if this Is approved without roadway dedications <br />or upgrades, which makes it more difficult to enforce the standards <br />in the future. <br />Jabbour reiterated this is an unusual circumstance. He noted the <br />former CouncI I determined the sewer project was more Important than <br />the addlticnal right-of-way acquisition. <br />Callahan referred to a similar case on Stubbs Bay Road whereby the <br />City made concessions In the past to allow development, which has <br />dictated future approvals. <br />Mayor Peterson asked the ramifications if approved. <br />Barrett felt approval might serve as a precedent. He added. <br />City made a decision in the past which they felt necessary <br />public safety, and now they are asked to pay the price. <br />the <br />for <br />Callahan referred to a recent subdivision request on North Arm <br />which the City recommended less dedication of right-of-way to <br />facilitate the subdivision. <br />Butler suggested approval per the applicant’s request, not <br />requiring additional road dedication. <br />Callahan accepted this suggestion as an amendment to his motion. <br />Gaffron asked that Counci I approve the dedication of the additional <br />right-of-way for Orono Orchard Road and Orono Lane, which does not <br />bring the parcel under the minimum acreage. <br />Butler suggested approving only conditions #2 through 7 and #9 in <br />the staff memo. Callahan agreed. <br />Callahan suggested the hardship for approval Is that the City <br />agreed to the subdivision by a contract which the Council <br />determines to be binding. <br />Vote: Ayes 3, nays 1. Mayor Peterson voted nay.