Laserfiche WebLink
- resolution #3212 <br />a request for a two lot subdivision of <br />standards of the septic <br />»ast of the property from which a private <br />Jd to serve both lots. The Planning <br />niinority opinion ape of the homestead lot. <br />Goetten, to adopt Resolution <br />, 793 North Ferndale Road, granting <br />Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />e configuration of the lot was common. <br />il. but is allowed to exist based on the <br />lakeshore and non-Iakeshore lots widths. <br />R. * RHONDA T. OMLIE, <br />[ANCES <br />1 were present. <br />previous meeting the Council approved <br />extend the garage along the same line <br />e noted the conditional use permit js <br />II for the drive and turnaround <br />also are requested for additional deck, <br />ginal proposal showed hardcover in the <br />ch has now been reduced to 30.7X. she <br />ing requires the use of geotechnical <br />1 and retaining walls resulting in <br />be very ambitious for the property and <br />proposed was excessive. She indicated <br />not justify the hardcover increases. <br />Dnded by Jabbour, to table Applications <br />iiliam R. and Rhonda T. 0ml le, i860 <br />e applicants time to reconsider their <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETINGHELD DECEMBER 14, 1992ZONING FILES #1768 & 1786 - CONT. <br />Larson asked what, if any, percentage of hardcover variance the <br />Council would consider. <br />Butler suggested the appiicants revise their proposal, reducing the <br />hardcover percentage as much as humanly possible to meet the <br />guidelines of the City. <br />(#10) #1775 ROBERT D. LUESSE, <br />3249 CASCO CIRCLE - <br />VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3213 <br />Robert Luesse was present. <br />Mabusth explained, per the Planning Commission recommendation, the <br />appIicant revised his proposal by attaching the garage and reducing <br />the size of the garage addition now at 22’x24’, but at the same <br />time made the structure an oversized structure. The Planning <br />Commission did not approve the 6’x8’ greenhouse addition. In <br />exchange for the two story I5’x16 1/2’ lakeside addition, the <br />Planning Commission asked that the deck on the north side of the <br />structure be removed and replaced with a smaller entry deck. <br />Mabusth noted the original propr al called for 37.2X hardcover and <br />the revised proposal is at 29.4/v. <br />Jabbour felt this proposal an improvement to the property. He felt <br />the applicant followed the directive of the Planning Commission <br />after their first meeting and should be allowed the green house. <br />Stephen Peterson stated the applicant did follow the directives of <br />the Planning Commission, but added the Planning Commission does not <br />get into redesigning an application at the meeting. <br />Butler felt the applicant should not be penalized for following <br />dIrectIons. <br />letter sent by Mr. LuesseGoetten referred to the compelling <br />expressing environmental concerns. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution <br />#3213, #1775 for Robert D. Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle, approving <br />variances for a garage addition at 28’x22’, and approving the <br />6’x8’ greenhouse, amending the resolution to reflect the approvals. <br />Ayes 5, nays 0.