Laserfiche WebLink
» QI VisI on, Is in the <br />' determine <br />to table <br />Ld» pending <br />M. <br />*^ere noted. <br />NG <br />providing <br />loted staff <br />>posai gain <br />ue of flood <br />o determine <br />11 and. <br />s discussed <br />^ppI I cat Ion <br />I I cant 11me <br />tion to the <br />ith the lot <br />>roposal be <br />P.M. <br />rred to as <br />le Planning <br />I a garage <br />Ho H r* t/ sin H <br />■' ! <br />* <br />t,S-: <br />,.r. ■ ■■. ■ •» -A._ _ <br />ri <br />■ J <br />To:Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members <br />Mayor Peterson and Orono City Council <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />cS. <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />September 18, 199^ <br />#1764 Austin Evans, 255 Landmark Drive - Preliminary <br />Subdivision ~ Public Hearing <br />Application: Request to split off a 2 acre building site from Lot 1, Block <br />1, Bayside Landing. <br />Zoning District: LR~1A, 2 acre minimum. <br />Pertinent Facts <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />Lot 1 Lot 2 <br />(House)(New) <br />Dry 2.06 Ac.1.20 Ac <br />Wetland 2.24 Ac.0.95 Ac <br />Total 4.30 Ac.2.1& Ac <br />250' +520* + <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit P <br />Application <br />Plat Map <br />Property Owners List <br />Survey <br />Comments from City Engineer <br />Copy of Section 10.55, Subd. 15(A“*3) and <br />Flood Fringe/Floodway Definitions <br />Issues <br />1. <br />2. <br />Section 10.55, Subd. 15{A-3) allows (for unsewered property) a density <br />credit for ’’flood fringe" lands equivalent to the amount of dry land, <br />to meet the acreage requirement. Applicant proposes to credit .95 <br />acres of flood fringe with 1.20 acres of dry buildable land to meet <br />the 2 acre requirement for Lot 2. <br />Few subdivisions in staff’s recollection have made use of this code <br />section since its adoption in 1979. In perhaps two or three cases, <br />existing lots of record have used the wetland credit for sewered <br />property. <br />Staff has initiated discussions with the applicant's engineer, the <br />City Engineer, and the DNR in attempting to determine whether all of <br />the proposed wetland area to be credited falls within the definition <br />of "flood fringe". Flood Fringe is defined as the area between the <br />floodway elevation (not strictly defined for this wetland as of this <br />rr <br />j:■ i: <br />I <br />i <br />* ' <br />i; <br />% <br />o <br />m <br />'>r <br />Zoning File #17 <br />September 18, 1 <br />Page 2 <br />3. <br />4. <br />f <br />. %n <br />ry' ^r <br />} ' 5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />writing) a: <br />based on t <br />defined at <br />may not be <br />Under the <br />meet the I <br />allow for <br />site, alt! <br />low land. <br />deep and J <br />contour c< <br />creek, wh€ <br />reduce the <br />substantia <br />The proper^ <br />recently a <br />intending * <br />2* KJOTB ' ' <br />City polic <br />permit is . <br />of which li <br />The cTrono <br />standard p <br />over the 1 <br />The park ft <br />A copy of <br />Department <br />2. We have <br />potential • <br />recommendat <br />approval f; <br />The City hi <br />lines exte <br />Drive. Th <br />driveway c <br />discussed ' <br />the impact <br />Since Baysi <br />road with! <br />access to 1 <br />•t. ‘41