Laserfiche WebLink
I- <br />BoyKe explainea cnac cne cicy approveu a meLe$ ana oounus aivision* <br />but It was not recorded at the County correctly. He is In the <br />process of trying to work that Issue out. <br />Chair Kelley felt that septic testing for the site may determine <br />where the property boundaries should be placed. <br />It was moved by Chair Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table <br />Application #1762 Paul W. Boyke, 793 North Ferndale Road, pending <br />septic test Information. Ayes 7, nays 0. <br />(#2) #1764 AUSTIN EVANS, <br />255 LANDMARK DRIVE - <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION -PUBLIC HEARING 7:42 - 7:50 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Pub 11 cat I on and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Austin Evans was present. <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1764 - CONT. <br />Gaffrcn explained that an out lot was established providing <br />lakeshore access to the lots In this development. He noted staff <br />recommends that only one of the two lots In this proposal gain <br />access from the outlet to the lake. He reviewed the Issue of flood <br />fringe areas, and stated the Planning Commission needs to determine <br />whether to treat this property as a flood fringe or wetland. <br />Evans requested the application be tabled until he has discussed <br />the ramifications with staff. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Rowlette, to table Application <br />#1764 Austin Evans, 255 Landmark Drive, to allow the applicant time <br />to discuss the proposal with staff. Ayes 7, nays 0. <br />John Thiesse, 3845 Bayside Road, stated he has no objection to the <br />proposal, but asked that the deeded lake rights remain with the lot <br />on the cul-de-sac. <br />Rowlette asked that only one of the lots within the proposal be <br />allowed lake access through the outlot. <br />(#3) #1621 TERRY 4 JONELL JOHNSON, <br />1045 LINDEN LANE - <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:15 - 7:40 P.M. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Johnson were present. <br />Saffron explained this current proposal Is being referred to as <br />Plan "0”. The application was first brought before the Planning <br />Commission about 1 1/2 years ago. The plan includes a garage