Laserfiche WebLink
Tot Chairman Kelley and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Noorse» City Administrator <br />Wramt Michael P. Gaffron# Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Dates <br />Subjects <br />October 9, 1992 <br />#1764 Austin EvanSr 255 Landmark Drive - Preliminary <br />Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />List of Bxhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Revised Survey <br />Planning Commision Action Notice 9<-23-92 <br />Planning Commission Minutes 9-21-92 <br />Memo and Exhibits of 9-18-92 <br />Discuasloo <br />After discussions with the DNRr applicant's engineer# and the <br />City Engineer* staff has concluded chat it would be appropriate in <br />this case to credit as "flood fringe" area portions of the wetland <br />above the 929.4' elevation contour. <br />Also# DNR staff indicated that they would not necessarily <br />consider that the shoreline of Stubbs Bay continues through the <br />culvert# and left it to the City's discretion as to whether we should <br />treat it as such. I have taken the conservative approach and asked <br />the surveyor to define a 75' setback from the 929.4' contour line on <br />both Lots 1 and 2. <br />Based on the above# proposed Lot 1 contains 2.06 dry buildable <br />acresi proposed Lot 2 contains 1.20 acres above the 931.5' elevation# <br />with an additional 0.92 acres creditable above the 929.4' contour# for <br />a total lot area of 2.12 acres above the 929.4' elevation. This would <br />appear to meet the intent of Section 10.55# Subd. 15 (A-3) regarding <br />credit for flood fringe lands. <br />The resulting building envelope for Lot 2 ranges from 60' to 120' <br />in width and 120' in depth# ample room for development of a residence. <br />Additional Factora <br />Following are additional poirts noted in the September 18th mer.o: <br />1.The property is serv^'cl with sewer but was assessed only one <br />unit as part of the Bayside North project# and this <br />assessment would logically be assigned to Lot 1. <br />A sewer stub can easily be provided to serve Lot 2. Note <br />that the sewer unit for Lot 2 would be charged the full unit <br />price not the reduced price# since the lot is not buildable <br />without sewer. This connection charge would be collected at <br />the time a building permit is issued for Lot 2. Council <br />y