My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
11-23-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
4/23/2024 1:44:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 9, 1992 <br />MARINA LICENSE UPDATE - CONT. <br />Jabbour asked if that is the City's project or Metropolitan Waste <br />Control Commission’s. Mabusth Indicated a portion of the project <br />was the City’s responsibility. <br />Butler felt it is always best to try to work with the owners, but <br />when there is a situation where they won’t even respond, the City <br />should initiate the denial resolution. <br />Goetten stated that North Shore and Lakeside Marinas have tried to <br />make an effort to comply with the City. She felt they should try <br />to continue to work together. <br />• <br />Callahan noted Mr. Dunn felt the p!antings were the responsibiIity <br />of the City and Dunn also felt the curbing done was inadequate. <br />Gerhardson indicated that a portion of the plantings are the <br />responsibility of the City. <br />Gaf^ion noted it is not just a nuestion of replacing trees that <br />were removed, but also plantings that were never put Into pla«e as <br />required by the City in 1981 with a previous application. He felt <br />the City should continue to try to work with North Shore and <br />Lakeside Marinas. <br />Mayor Peterson directed staff to draft a denial resolution for <br />Gayles Marina. <br />(•12) STYROFOAM ORDINANCE - TERMINOLOGY AMENDMENT <br />ORDINANCE #110, SECOND SERIES <br />Callahan agreed that the word “styrofoam’’ should be removed If <br />people are trying to maintain a brand name, but noted he thought <br />that was a general term. He asked if the substitute wording would <br />cover ail other similar products. <br />Gaff •'on noted the language incorporated is only Intended to cover <br />polystyrene. <br />Jabbour noted other agencies have adopted very generic language to <br />cover potential products introduced. He added the Wisconsin DNR has <br />asked for immediate removal of styrofoam products. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Ordinance <br />miO, Second Series, and to direct staff to write a proper letter <br />concaining proper language. Ayes 5, nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.