My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
11-23-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
4/23/2024 1:44:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD NOVEMBER 9, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1771 « CONT. <br />Mabusth explained the original 1976 subdivision granted lot width <br />variances for the properties. A drainage maintenance application <br />permit was issued to a series of landowners in the area who <br />received benefits from the project. The spoils from that dredging <br />were placed on this property, and the City had warned at that time <br />that it may impact future development of the property and septic <br />sites. The owners are currently having a problem locating a septic <br />system for a four bedroom home on the northern lot. The lot line <br />rearrangement would provide both lots with primary and alternate <br />septic sites. Mabusth noted with a previous subdivision of property <br />to the south the City required a 17’ right-of-way easement, which <br />the rtarkoe property cannot satisfy without encroaching the septic <br />sites. The Council requested an 8 1/2’ right-of-way easement with <br />a previously approved lot line rearrangement for this property, but <br />the process was never completed. She recommended the r.ounci I <br />consider these properties as having riparian access p.r the new <br />shoreline regulations, which would mean the properties conform to <br />the lot width requirements at the shoreline. <br />Jabbour noted there is room on the northern lot for a septic system <br />for a two bedroom home. He felt the Community has very diverse <br />housing and he felt that is needed. <br />Callahan felt only be.'rg able to build a two bedroom house on a <br />property is not a hardship. <br />Goetten questioned the need for a 50’ right-of-way. <br />Don Peterson explained In 1990 his company owned the southern lot <br />and at that time they knew the septic system was feasible. Mrs. <br />Axel owned the nortliern lot and at that time it was realized that <br />the property would only support a two bedroom home because of the <br />septic requirements. The Markoes then purchased both properties <br />with the Intent to build one house on both lots, but were <br />transferred out of State recently. He noted the requirement of a <br />17’ right-of-way easement would encroach two septic systems on the <br />western lot line. He felt the entire parcel would require someone <br />to build a $800,000+ house, which the neighborhood does not <br />support. <br />Callahan asked if the Markoes had planned to build that type of <br />house. <br />Don Peterson said he had not seen their plans, but felt the Markoes <br />would not gat their money out of the property if it sold as one <br />parcel. <br />k
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.