My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
11-23-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
4/23/2024 1:44:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M <br />PHONE NO. <br />STATE OF <br />Nl M d S © <br />^DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />•waters, 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106 <br />(612) 772-7916 FILE NO <br />October 30, 1992 <br />The Honorable Barbara Peterson <br />Mayor, City of Orono <br />P.O. Box 164 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Dear Mayor Peterson: <br />REVIEW AND COMMENT ON CITY OF GREENWOOD'S REQUEST FOR FLEXIBILITY <br />FROM STATE OF MINNESOTA'S SHORELAND MANAGEMENT STANDARDS <br />required by the statewide shoreland nanaqenent standards, the <br />Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) <br />and the City of Greenwood are hereby notifying your city of <br />Greenwood's request for flexibility from the statewide standards as <br />outlined below, and in the enclosure prepared by the city's <br />consultant. In accordance with the rules, the Commissioner and the <br />city must solicit the input and approval of other goveriunertal <br />bodies that could be affected or impacted by the alternate <br />controls. The city and the DNR are asking that your city provide <br />its review and comments, if any, to either DNR or the city within <br />45 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received <br />prior to then, we will assxime that your city has no concerns with <br />the neighboring city's proposal. <br />The City of Greenwood is requesting flexibility from the following <br />statewide standards: <br />1. Building height, and <br />2. Impervious surface coverage. <br />A discussion of this request has been prepared by the city attorney <br />and is attached for you and/or your staff to review. The above <br />requests have been presented by the city attwa.ney for review and <br />discussion by representatives of 11 Lake Minnetonka cities who are <br />working together as a Technical Review Committee for the purpose of <br />reviewing and discussing individual city's flexibility requests <br />affecting Lake Minnetonka. No problems with the city's request <br />have been noted at any of those meetings. <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 6V=LOt't.R <br />i <br />d
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.