My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-1992 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
11-23-1992 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 1:47:37 PM
Creation date
4/23/2024 1:44:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
306
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC IILARINO - IMIKASANT LAWN IIOMLOWNI-RS ASSOCI ATION <br />September 23t 1992 <br />Ed Mahoney said he was President of the Associntion when the <br />Association was formed. A problem was created when the laeoon <br />was dredged and certain lots no longer had shoreline. At that <br />time the affected lots were given permanent easements over lot 14 <br />for access to the lagoon. He. as owner of Lot 15. is included in <br />the application because his lot has no shoreline, and his dock is <br />on his easement over Lot 14. His dock is a free standing dock, <br />next to but not connected to the Association dock. Mahoney <br />explained that the other five members of the Association have <br />Lake access through their own lots. <br />Grathwol asked Thibault if there is any reason why the <br />license should not granted. Thibault said there is an encroach <br />ment into the 10* setback on the south side of the dock. The dock <br />was put in before there were setback requirements. The dock does <br />not cross over the extended property lines. The neighbor to the <br />south. Carol Burgess, has furnished a letter stating she has no <br />objection to the setback encroachment. Thibault said LeFevere <br />has advised her a variance is not needed for a setback encroach <br />ment as long as there is approval of the neighbor. <br />LeFevere said originally it was thought there " <br />problem because of the way the shoreline meander.s <br />It was thought the Assoc'ation may have to prove grandfathered <br />rights. He said that problem was solved when it was determined <br />there is 280’ of shoreline contiguous to the dock. <br />Rascop asked how many boats were kept at the - / ~ <br />slip #2. Forrer said there is one boat per dock. He docks a -- <br />boat there. The 50’ length is primarily for walkway purposes. <br />Thibault explained it is a wooden dock which is located in a <br />sh6lt6r6d ar€ci and not rcftioved in the winter. r i • ^ <br />Babcock noted the application indicates 925 of <br />It was explained that included the shore I me on the is land. The <br />aoDlication will be corrected to show 280’ of shoreline. <br />Ther^ being no further testimony the Public Hearing was <br />Structures Committee will <br />at their meeting on Saturday. October 10. at 7:30 AM at the LMCD <br />offices. <br />Findings: <br />Joe Forrer. President of Pheasant Lawn Homeowners Associa <br />tion. has submitted a new multiple dock license application <br />for a six slip multiple dock on Lot 14. <br />Lot 14 is an out lot owned by the eleven members of the <br />Pheasant Lawn Homeowners Association. <br />3) Six off-l«ke property owners, members of ’r""; <br />-mb^;’roVtb:'is^oViu‘.ron^%^ Uk^s’^or-e-'-lotl^' <br />) <br />i 1i ; <br />\ <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.