11-09-1992 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 12, 1990 ZONING^FIL^E *1488-R0GERS^C0NW^^ Nettles, seconded by Mayor ^rr^t' Mr. Rogers' builder asked why it would not be up to any future subdivider/developer of‘the property to pay the sewer charges at the time of subdivision? Mabusth explained ^h^^ i. was a requirement of the Code that sewer charges be paid at the time the conditional use is granted. Mabusth also noted that it may be beneficial for Mr. Rogers to pay the sewer charges at this rate rather than paying an inflated amount in the future. Mr, Rogers asked if a kitchen may be added at a later date? Mabusth replied that the kitchen may be added, but that a separate building per.nit must be obtained to do so. Motion, Ayes-5, Nays- 0, Motion passed. #1490 K-P PROPERTIES 340/350 NORTH ARM LANE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION cc Mr. Don Pet- r.*on was present for the review of this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the purpose of the lot line rearrangement sought with this application. Bernharason stated some of the historical facts surrounding this property and North Arm Lane. The Planning Commission had reco^ended of the lot line rearrangement due in part to their belief that 17' of right-of-way should be dedicated to the City for a future road. The Planning Commission, during their review of ^^i® matter, had asked whether it would be possible to dedicate 8.5 in lieu of 17’. At that time, staff felt that even 8.5* would interfere with the area required for the on-site septic system. Bernhardson stated that further review of the site has indicated the possibility of locating the septic sites in a way that would allow the dedication of 8.5' of right-of-way. Bernhardson suggested that should this matter be approved, it be conceptually approved because the potential sites must be tested in the spring. /A Mr. his was Mabusth informed Council that should they require Peterson to dedicate 17', Mr. Peterson would withdraw^ application. Mabusth suggested that the dedication of 8.5 better than no dedication from this property at all. Mr. Peterson noted that if there is to be a dedication of 8.5' a 10' variance will be required because 20' is required fi’om the road right-of-way to a septic system. Mr. Peterson showed the Council where the new septic locations will be on the properties. Mr. Peterson indicated that he had no objections to staff's recommendations. Councilmember Callahan asked for clarification regarding the 10' variance for the septic system setback. - 14 - r