My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
10-12-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:15:02 PM
Creation date
4/16/2024 2:11:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 18, 1991 <br />(#3)ZONING FILE 11621-TERRY & JONELL JOHNSON <br />1045 LINDEN LANE <br />VARIANCES-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />Terry Johnson was present. <br />Kelley re-convened the Public Hearing on this matter at 7:40 <br />p. in <br />Gaffron briefly reviewed the Johnson's revised plan, as <br />noted in his memo dated March 11, 1991. <br />Terry Johnson noted that it was not hts intention to <br />encroach into the side yard setback area, and that the deck <br />behind the garage would meet that setback. <br />Kell»^y stated that he would not deny the applicants' need <br />for an attached garage. He said, "I am concerned that if we <br />weigh t.he reduction in the 250-500' setback area against the <br />increase proposed for the 75-250' area, that it would still be <br />possible for' the applicants to request additional hardcover in <br />the 250-500' at some l=»ter date. Hardcover n the 2o0-500 <br />setback area would only be 23%, and 30% is allowed. <br />Gaffron suggested that the resolution could state that <br />hardcover on the entire lou cannot exceed 25.2%. <br />Kelley asked Johnson if he would be amenable to entirely <br />TGnioving the deck on the back of garage. <br />Johnson replied, "If we could keep the deck along the front <br />of the house, we would not mind excluding the deck on the back of <br />the garage." <br />Bellows asked G?ffron if he had received a grading plan from <br />t.he applicant >. She said, "As I recall, the driveway will be <br />like a waters oot. There is a very steep grade change from the <br />road down to the house." <br />Johnson stated that the previous owners had devised a method <br />for diverting water around the side of the garage. <br />Be lows said, "With the changes you are proposing to make to <br />the driveway, it will become a water channel. It will all <br />of the water ccming from the street, and dump it into your house. <br />It is necessary to see the grading plan. Another reason this <br />concerns me is that I foresee some elaborate grading plan coming <br />being prepa’ i that will channel all t.hat water around t .e house <br />and dump it .n the 0-75' setback area. <br />Johnson stated that he would provide more information in <br />accordance with Bellows' concerns. <br />- 6 -•i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.