My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-12-1992 Council Minutes2
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
10-12-1992 Council Minutes2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:15:02 PM
Creation date
4/16/2024 2:11:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1621 - CONT. <br />Bellows said the numbers speak for themselves, and reminded her <br />that the hardcover they are discussing is in different zones, thus <br />impacting the lake differently. <br />Mr. Johnson asked If run-off is less crucial when absorbed in one <br />area opposed to another. <br />Bellows stated by removing the garage, the applicants are helping <br />the run-off situation somewhat, but are making the situation worse <br />In the zone nearer the lake. <br />Chair Kelley asked Gaffron at what point the City will stop the <br />project if it is determined that the foundation cannot be re-used. <br />Gaffron stated the City has felt it is critical to determine what <br />will happen to the foundation, and halt work if the foundation is <br />found to be Inadequate. <br />Chair Kelley asked if as long as the foundation remains. It Is <br />policy to allow the entire first floor to be removed. <br />Gaffron explained at a point when staff is dealing with foundation <br />Issues, it will be brought back for Planning Commission’s review <br />in relation to the location of the structure. <br />Chair Kelley commented that he wanted the applicants to be aware <br />of the City’s position. He added. If the foundation Is found to be <br />inadequate, the City may require that the entire structure be moved <br />further back on the lot to meet all requirements of the code. <br />Bellows added, there Is a point when it Is not feasible to salvage <br />a portion of an existing house. <br />Schroeder asked about further removals In the 0-75’ zone. <br />Cohen stated they have already removed hardcover In that zone. <br />Johnson re-emphasized that the impact on the lake :s due to the <br />drainage not the additional hardcover. He felt the City Engineer <br />should suggest ways to alleviate the drainage problem. <br />Mr. Johnson said they were wiI Iing to work with the City Engineer. <br />Mrs. Johnson noted the house is not Iiveable In Its present- state, <br />and wished to proceed with the process. <br />ZONING FILE #1621 - CONT. <br />]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.